| |
Forensic traces left at the scene of a contract killing and the results of their study following the inspection of the scene provide a prospect of identifying the perpetrator during the investigation, but, as a rule, do not prove a causal relationship between the crime committed and the customer, since in most cases, the perpetrator of this crime and its customer do not know each other, the perpetrator has no idea about the motive for the order received, and the customer - about its technical execution. In cases of contract killings, a reasonable search for information about the motive for the crime is simultaneously a way to establish information about the alleged customer of this crime. Considering that the motive for ordering a murder is born on the basis of a conflict of interests (assessed by the customer as vital), then the customer of the crime must be identified in the direction of searching for information about the circumstances, the mode and conditions of which, at the will of the victim of the crime, complicated or blocked the implementation of the customer's interest in a particular area (field). This means that the establishment of a system of various types of relationships with the victim of a crime in the last months of his life, and in some cases in the last years, taking into account the ongoing nature of these relationships, is the basis for evidentiary access to the person who ordered the crime.
Keywords:Forensic traces, operational investigative measures, investigative actions, contract killing, customer of the crime, perpetrator of the crime, victim of the crime, crime event, mechanism of committing the crime, motive for committing the crime, obstruction of the investigation of the crime, inspection of the crime scene, concealment of traces of the crime, conflict of interests, significant interest.
|
LEGAL
INFORMATION:
