| |
The issue of international information security, which includes international legal counteraction to cybercrime, is one of the most controversial and controversial issues since the emergence of this phenomenon. The list of cybercrimes is fixed in almost all international agreements regarding crimes in the field of information technology. However, now, given the rapid development of technology in the era of digitalization, the classification of cybercrimes contained in existing international agreements is losing relevance. The analysis of international agreements on cybercrime, as well as the development and adoption of a new universal convention that will regulate new types of cybercrime, seems necessary to address this issue.
The author draws attention to the fact that such crimes in the field of information technology as cryptojacking, cyberbullying or deepfake are not fixed in international agreements. In order to fill the gap in the above-mentioned problem, the author conducts a comparative legal analysis of international agreements regulating the fight against cybercrime and defines a new classification of cybercrime, which is not enshrined in international treaties.
The conducted research allowed the author to identify an additional classification. according to the following criterion of the object: "illegal use of information and communication technologies for the purpose of violating personal rights in terms of honor and dignity, as well as property in the information space." The following types of cybercrimes follow from this thesis: a) cyberbullying, b) deepfake, c) cryptojacking, d) duffel carding.
Keywords:cybercrime, cyberbullying, cryptojacking, deepfake, carding, information and communication technologies, international information security.
|
LEGAL
INFORMATION:
