Tsvetkov Yuri Andreevich (postgraduate student, Department of Clinical Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery No. 2 "Yaroslavl State Medical University" of the Ministry of Health of Russia Federation)
Bessonov Sergey Nikolaevich (MD, Associate Professor of the Department of Clinical Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery No. 2 of the
Yaroslavl State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
)
Tsvetkov Andrey Vasilyevich (Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Microbiology with Virology and Immunology of the Yaroslavl State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation )
Galstyan Samvel Galustovich (Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Dentistry St. Petersburg State Pediatric University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation)
Timofeev Evgeny Vladimirovich (Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation)
Rumyantsev Nikita Vyacheslavovich (Assistant at the Department of Clinical Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery No. 2 “Yaroslavl State Medical University of the Ministry health Russia Federation)
| |
Introduction. Augmentation of the jaw bone is one of the main tasks of orthopedic treatment of a dental patient. This is due to the fact that after tooth extraction, structural and metabolic changes take place in the bone tissue, which cause the reduction of the ridge in the vertical and horizontal directions. Periodontal diseases, injury of the alveolar process and other significant factors can also affect the process of excessive bone resorption. Goal. To perform an X-ray analysis of the size of the bone tissue of the alveolar process 6 months after augmentation. Materials and methods. The patients were divided into two groups: a group of patients who underwent augmentation with autosteal blocks (21 people) and a second group of patients who underwent bone augmentation of directed bone regeneration (NCR) using xenogenic bone materials (27 people). Results. After autoplasty, the minimum values of vertical dimensions were 9.2 mm, and the maximum values were 12.2 mm. On average, the vertical bone growth per group after autoplasty surgery was 0.83 mm. The values of vertical dimensions in patients operated by the NCR method were 9.1 mm, and the maximum values were 13.5 mm. On average, the vertical bone growth per group after the NCR operation was 0.69 mm. Conclusions. The data obtained indicate that there is no significantly significant difference in terms of vertical size increase in the two augmentation methods. The obtained data on the increase in the width of the alveolar process prove a significantly significant advantage of the autoplasty method over the NCR and an increase in the width of the alveolar ridge by an average of 0.83 mm more than the NCR method.
Keywords:implant, bone tissue, ridge reduction, autoplasty
|
|
| |
|
Read the full article …
|
Citation link:
Tsvetkov Y. A., Bessonov S. N., Tsvetkov A. V., Galstyan S. G., Timofeev E. V., Rumyantsev N. V. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF BONE GRAFTING OF THE ALVEOLAR PROCESS (PART) OF THE JAW WITH XENOPLASTIC AND AUTOPLASTIC MATERIALS. // Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Серия: Естественные и Технические Науки. -2024. -№10/2. -С. 198-203 DOI 10.37882/2223-2966.2024.10-2.32 |
|
|
