Vysochina Julia Lenarovna (Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor
Departments of Social Sciences and Humanities
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution
of Higher Education
«South Ural State Medical University»
of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
)
Sadardinov David Nailevich (Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution
of Higher Education
«South Ural State Medical University»
of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
)
Kubasov Savely Fedorovich (Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution
of Higher Education
«South Ural State Medical University»
of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
)
| |
The article examines the problematic situations that arise when implementing such bioethical principles as patient autonomy, "do no harm" (primum non nocere) and «do good» when making a clinical decision in the practice of medical care. An attempt to be guided by ethical regulations in the conditions of real medicine often encounters contradictions within the ethical principle itself. This is especially acute in the modern model of relationships built on a collegial basis: one principle conflicts with another and inevitably leads to a conflict of interests between the doctor and the patient.
Keywords:ethical principles, patient autonomy, the principle of benevolence, the principle of non-harm, conflict of interest, models of doctor-patient relationship
|
|
| |
|
Read the full article …
|
Citation link:
Vysochina J. L., Sadardinov D. N., Kubasov S. F. COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF «DO NO HARM» (PRIMUM NON NOCERE), «DO GOOD» AND THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY AS A CONFLICT OF INTERESTS BETWEEN A DOCTOR AND A PATIENT // Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Серия: Познание. -2024. -№05. -С. 90-94 DOI 10.37882/2500-3682.2024.05.03 |
|
|
