Panesh Uchuzhuk Maskhudovich (Doctor of Philology, Professor at the Literature and Mass Communications Department at the Adyghe State University, Maykop, Adygea, Republic, Russia)
Shishkhova Nelya Magomedovna (Candidate of History, Associate Professor at the Literature and Mass Communications Department at the Adyghe State University.
Maykop, Adygea Republic, Russia
)
Ankudinov Kirill Nikolayevich (Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, Adyghe State University, Department of Literature Science and Journalism.
Maykop, Adygea Republic, Russia
)
Sokokova Galina Viktorovna (Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, Adyghe State University, Department of Literature Science and Journalism.
Maykop, Adygea Republic, Russia
)
Ashinova Yulia Arambievna (Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, Adyghe State University, Department of Literature Science and Journalism.
Maykop, Adygea Republic, Russia
)
| |
The article deals with the problem of the existence of “I” in a romantic text on the example of Russian poetic texts of the second half of the 20th and early 21st centuries. The basis of the romantic worldview is the conflict between the “I” and the outside world (“Not-I”). In some romantic works, the hero is presented by the author not as a single “I”, but as a collective “We”. The definition of the “We” mode is the main goal of the study. The theories of modern literary critics (in particular, M. Lipovetsky), who consider the romantic “We” as a set of hypostases of the author’s “I” are criticized in the article. On the example of A. Voznesensky’s short poem “The Masters” it is demonstrated that the romantic “We” can be differentiated in relation to the author’s “I”, separating from it according to chronological characteristics. In the text of the poem, the persons that make up “We” reside in the 16th century, while the author’s “I” exists in the 20th century. But this does not prevent the author’s “I” from joining the “We” community. The term ‘open diaspora’ is introduced into scientific circulation, which characterizes the common “We” and its relationship with the author’s “I”. This community is a conflicting minority in relation to the outside world, but tends to become a majority in the future. It does not coincide with any of the defined social structures; however, some positive content can be traced behind this commonality. It is not defined, but it is definable. The author’s “I” is included in the community, but does not exhaust it by itself, while the conflict between the community and the world around it is genuine, tragic and irreconcilable, and the ideology that colors the declarations and actions of the community can be any. Variants of the existence of the concept of ‘open diaspora’ in the romantic text are considered on the basis of the poetic works of B. Okudzhava, I. Zhdanov and M. Strukova. The main research method is the structural hermeneutics of the existential content of a literary text.
Keywords:romanticism, “I”, Diaspora, Open Minority, A. Voznesensky, B. Okydzgiava, I. Zhdanov, M. Strukova
|
|
| |
|
Read the full article …
|
Citation link:
Panesh U. M., Shishkhova N. M., Ankudinov K. N., Sokokova G. V., Ashinova Y. A. ROMANTIC “I” AS AN “OPEN DIASPORA” IN THE RUSSIAN POETRY OF THE 60S OF THE 20TH – 21ST CENTURIES. // Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Серия: ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ. -2024. -№06. -С. 169-173 DOI 10.37882/2223-2982.2024.06.21 |
|
|
