|
An object of thought has a certain degree of independence as the characteristic feature of a particular unit. This independence is based on various similarities between objects in reality. Significant and non-significative features and properties may be similar. the semantic connection between the derived and producing lexical meanings is stable, and the word paradigm violation in the derived lexical meaning is not observed when the transfer of a name is based on any feature included in the significat of a word. A word that is semantically consistent with its direct and derived meanings cannot be a key word. It causes ambiguity, which is removed by context or by the inclusion of a keyword in the sentence. The source of emotionality of the derived meaning is the denotative-significative generating meaning. As the above observations show, in the formation of a derived lexical meaning for object names, two denotations are involved, which has similar, usually non-significative, features. This state of affairs does not exclude the possibility of polysemantic word being semantically consistent with the same word in both direct and derivative meanings. In this case, one subject name receives a new lexical meaning, and another denotation, to which the name of the first denotation is transferred, receives a new name based on the transferred feature.
Keywords:lexeme, derived meaning, denotation, metonymy, metaphor, semantic connection, significant, attribute, object, subject
|